Skip Navigation


International Journal of Law and Information Technology Advance Access originally published online on July 23, 2007
International Journal of Law and Information Technology 2007 15(3):320-361; doi:10.1093/ijlit/eam001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/3/320    most recent
eam001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Law and Information Technology Vol. 15 No. 3 © Oxford University Press 2006; all rights reserved

The United Kingdom Identity Cards Act 2006—Civil or Criminal?

Clare Sullivan*

* LLM (Adelaide), MBA (Adelaide). Adjunct Lecturer, International Graduate School of Business, University of South Australia. PhD Candidate, Law School, University of Adelaide


   Abstract

After much controversy and debate, the United Kingdom Parliament passed the Identity Cards Act in March 2006. The new national identity registration scheme established under the legislation will be in operation in 2 years. Initially the scheme will not be generally compulsory, though the intention is eventually to make it mandatory. The Act uses a mix of civil penalty and offence provisions as part of its enforcement regime. This article considers the approach of the legislation, particularly the practical implications of authentication and verification of identity under the scheme and the potential impact on the effectiveness of the enforcement regime, having regard to the right against self-incrimination under the Human Rights Act 1988 (UK) and Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950, and the common law privilege against self-incrimination.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.