Skip Navigation


International Journal of Law and Information Technology Advance Access originally published online on October 14, 2008
International Journal of Law and Information Technology 2009 17(3):282-303; doi:10.1093/ijlit/ean010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/282    most recent
ean010v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, P. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Law and Information Technology Vol. 17 No. 3 © Oxford University Press 2008; all rights reserved

Pirates of the Internet, At Intellectual Property's End With Torrents and Challenges for Choice of Law

P. Sean Morris*

* LLM, Helsinki, MSc, Intellectual Property Law, Swedish School of Economics and MPhil, Birkbeck, University of London. This article drew on ideas developed during seminars at the Swedish School of Economics in Helsinki. Thanks to Niklas Bruun, Mikko Valimaki and especially Marcus Norrgärd for constructive feedback on the paper and during different stages of seminars on intellectual property law. The views are those of the author and errors remain mine thereof, p.sean.morris{at}gmail.com


   Abstract

This article will address three fundamental issues (i) the impact and legal status of BitTorrent technology on copyright infringement of music, software and movies over the internet (ii) damages and the enforcement of intellectual property rights via the EC Directive and (iii) argue that damages should continue to be used as a form of deterrence to illegal file sharing and "torrents" download by the end users who are enticed in the first place by the "torrent" up loaders through their websites and internet service providers "ISP’s" who might bear indirect liability for copyright infringement. The central point is that the same manner in which taxes are due to the state and failure to render unto "Caesar" what is due will likely result in a fine or prison sentence the same approach must be taken to internet copyright infringement through file sharing and "torrents" where there is a copyright infringement. A comparison of three recent cases that were decided on the BitTorrent technology platform will be used to bolster the arguments. The article begin with an overview of legal and economic argument in the current debate on internet copyright infringement then assess the enforcement of such infringement through the EC Directive on enforcement of intellectual property and its relations to damages and then concludes with the impact on choice of law for internet copyright infringement that takes place beyond national borders.

Key Words: IP Enforcement • File sharing • torrents • damages • software piracy • digital media • liability • infringement


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.